REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF RTI ACT, 2005
FOR THE YEAR 2007 – 2008
I. PARTICULARS OF REPORTING PUBLIC AUTHORITY :
1. Name of the office : Registrar of Cooperative Societies Office
2. Number of gazetted officers : Eighteen (18) nos.
4. Names of Public Sector undertakings, : 10 State Level Cooperative Organisations
Boards, Council etc. under the office.
5. Names of NGOs assisted by the Department : NIL
II. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 OF RTI ACT :
1. Whether all the records are duly catalogued and indexed by the office?
If not reason as to why? : YES
2. Whether information Hand Book under RTI Act as required by Sec 4(1 )(b) in the prescribed
template has been prepared by the office ? If not reason as to why? : YES
3. Whether all relevant facts relating to formulation of important policies have been published by
the department/office as required under sec.4(l)9(b)? : YES
4. Whether suo moto information has been provided to the public at regular intervals as required
by Sec 4 (2)? : YES
5. Whether every information in the department/office has been widely dessiminated as required
by Sec 4(3)? : YES
6. Whether information in the department/office has been made accessible to SPIO concerned as
required by Sec. 4(4)? : YES
III. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 5 :
1. How many SAPIOs have been designated in the office? If not why? : 9 Nos.
2. How many SPIOs have been appointed in the office? If not why? : 5 Nos.
3. How many DAAs have been appointed in the office? If not why? : 2 Nos.
4. When were these designations made? Kindly enclose a copy of such orders. : xerox copy enclosed.
5. Whether any assistance of any other officer has been sought by SPIO? If so, in how many
cases? : NIL
IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 6 :
1. No. of applications received in the office. : 1 (one)
2. How many applications had been assisted by the SPIO to reduce an application in writing
under Sec. 6(1 )(b)? : NIL
3. How many applications have been referred to another PA/Office for providing information? : NIL
4. Amount of application fees received. Were these deposited to the Government? : Rs.10 not yet
deposited
V. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 7 :
1. How many applications were decided within the prescribed time limit? : 1 (one)
2. How many applications were rejected by the SPIO? What were the main ground for rejecting
the applications? : 1 (one) – Due to non payment of prescribed fee.
3. How many applications were not decided within the prescribed limitation? What are the main
reasons for not deciding the applications within limitation? : NIL
4. How many applications were received concerning the life or liberty of a person? : NIL
5. Whether application concerning the life or liberty of a person were decided within a period of
48 hours from the time of receipt of the application? : NIL
6. How many applicants failed to make payment of cost of providing the information? State the
amount? : 1 (one) – Rs.10/-
7. How many applicants belonging to BPL were provided information free of cost? And how
many of them were denied information free of cost? : NIL
8. How many sensorily disabled applicants were assisted by the SPIO? : NIL
9. How many applicants were given information free of cost due to failure of the PA to provide the
information within limitation? : NIL
10. In how many applications a third party was involved? : NIL
11. Amount of fees collected for the provision of such information during the reported period. : NIL
VI. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 8 :
1. How many applicants were denied Information under Sec. 8? Give reasons used for
denying such information. : NIL
2. How many applicants were given information under Sec. 8 on the ground of larger public
interest? : NIL
VII. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 9 :
1. How many applicants were rejected on the ground specified under Sec. 9 of RTI Act? : NIL
VIII. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 15 :
1. The Provisions of Section 15 came into force on 15.6.2005 under Sec. 1(3) of the Act Whether
the SIC was formed at once as per Sec. 1(3) of the Act ? If not, please give reasons thereof. : YES
2. What action have been taken for maintaining and upholding the autonomy of the MSIC according
to the pro visions of Sec 15(4) of the Act. : NIL
IX. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 18 :
1. How many complaints have been instituted before the MSIC relating to the Office? : NIL
2. How many such complaints have been disposed off by the Commission? : NIL
3. How many decisions/directions of the Commission on such rulings has been complied with
by the Office? : NIL
X. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 19 :
1. How many appeals have been instituted before the DAA against the actions/inaction of the
SPIO in the Office? : NIL
2. How many such first appeals were decided by the DAA within a period of 45 days from the date of
filing the first appeal? : NIL
3. How many first appeals were rejected? : NIL
4. How many first appeals were allowed? : NIL
5. How many 2nd appeals were preferred against the first Apellete Authority before the MSIC? : NIL
6. How many 2nd appeals were decided by MSIC and how many appeals were pending? : NIL
7. How many appeals were allowed by the Commission and how many were disallowed? : NIL
8. In how many cases the Commission made recommendations and what are the actions taken
by the Office on such recommendations? : NIL
XII. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 20 :
1. In how many cases the MSIC has issued imposition of penalty? : NIL
2. In how many cases penalties were imposed by the MSIC? Please state the amount of penalty,
if any. : NIL
3. In how many cases the Commission has recommended disciplinary actions of SPIO? : NIL
XIII. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 25 :
1. What are the recommendations if any for compliance of the provisions of the RTI Act by
the Office? : NIL
XIV. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 26 :
1. What are the departmental and organisational programmes conducted by the Office in respect of
exercise of the RTI as contemplated under Sec. 26(l)(a)? : NIL
2. What actions were taken by the Office to encourage FAs in the developmental
organisations of such programmes as mentioned aboved? : NIL
3. What were the actions taken by the office to promote the Act? : NIL
